Is Taking Photos of People Without Consent Illegal? US Law Explained

Posted by

In the United States, the legality of taking photographs of people without their consent is a nuanced subject, intricately tied to expectations of privacy, the setting of the photograph, and the use of the image. This complexity arises from a blend of federal and state laws, court rulings, and the First Amendment rights. Understanding the legal landscape requires dissecting these components, offering clarity to photographers, subjects of photography, and legal enthusiasts alike.

Related posts

Federal and State Privacy Laws

At the federal level, privacy laws such as the Privacy Act of 1974 primarily regulate the collection and dissemination of personal information by federal agencies, rather than the act of taking photographs. However, state laws vary significantly, with some states enacting laws that directly impact the legality of photographing individuals without consent.

Expectation of Privacy: A key concept in determining legality is the expectation of privacy. Public places, including parks, streets, and city squares, typically do not afford individuals a reasonable expectation of privacy. This means that photographing people in these settings without consent is generally legal. However, private settings, such as homes, restrooms, and dressing rooms, offer a higher expectation of privacy, making unauthorized photography potentially illegal.

Harassment and Stalking: While taking a photo in a public space may not be illegal, using photography as a means to harass or stalk someone can lead to criminal charges. Laws against harassment and stalking can be invoked if photography is used in such a manner.

Commercial Use: The use of someone’s likeness for commercial purposes without their consent can violate their right to publicity, which is recognized in several states. This means that while taking the photo may not be illegal, using it in an advertisement or for other commercial purposes without the subject’s consent could lead to legal repercussions.

Various court rulings have shaped the understanding of photography laws in the US. For example, the case of Nussenzweig v. DiCorcia (2006) highlighted New York’s stance that street photography for artistic purposes is protected under the First Amendment, even without the subject’s consent.

First Amendment Considerations

The First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of expression, including photography. This protection is particularly strong in public spaces, where photography is often considered a form of free speech or newsgathering activity.

Photography in Sensitive Locations

Photography in certain sensitive locations, such as military bases, government buildings, and critical infrastructure, may be restricted or prohibited for security reasons. These restrictions are typically signposted and enforced by law.


The legality of taking pictures of people without their consent in the US is largely dependent on the context in which the photography occurs and the intended use of the images. Photographers should be mindful of privacy expectations, state laws, and the potential commercial use of their images to navigate the legal landscape successfully.


How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 3.7 / 5. Vote count: 3

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *